- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:50:45 -0400
- To: Kendall Grant Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Michael F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, SXXren Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Frank van Harmelen <frank.van.harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, Semantic Web Interest Group <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Fabian M. Suchanek" <f.m.suchanek@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@csail.mit.edu>, Mark Greaves <markg@vulcan.com>, "georgi.kobilarov" <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, Jens Lehmann <lehmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Frederick Giasson <fred@fgiasson.com>, Michael Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>, Conor Shankey <cshankey@reinvent.com>, Kira Oujonkova <koujonkova@reinvent.com>, Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>, Ivan Mikhailov <iv@openlinksw.com>, Orri Erling <oerling@openlinksw.com>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
FWIW, I wouldn't mind at all seeing (i) the main discussion move to a public list like Tim suggested, (ii) the stuff like the below moving to private email.... On May 14, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Kendall Grant Clark wrote: > Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of Wed May 14 16:08:39 -0400 > 2008: > >> Okay, the JDBC bit is good, and we can easily test Owlgres against >> Virtuoso JDBC. But of course, we end up with the obvious question: >> Why >> are we using JDBC to talk to a DBMS engine equipped with a Quad >> Store? > > I don't know, Kingsley, why are you doing that? We're *not* doing that > presently, so it's not a super interesting question for *us*. YMMV. > >> We've been through this re. recent work relating to new Model >> Providers >> for Sesame, Jena, and Redland (all of which offer SQL DBMS and Graph >> Model persistence APIs). > > Okay, I guess I'm just not clever enough to realize what anything > you all have > been doing with those systems has anything to do with what we're > doing? > >> I am trying to determine if we've ended up with two things that are >> artificially disconnected :-) > > Only under a robust, extensive set of assumptions that I guarantee > "we" do not > share. :> > > Cheers, > Kendall "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?." - Albert Einstein Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler Tetherless World Constellation Chair Computer Science Dept Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 20:51:24 UTC