W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2008

Re: FOAF OWL DL

From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:16:34 +0200
Message-ID: <ef5083470806110416q3509c042j53b1be5d64c1d2ff@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cristiano Longo" <cristiano.longo@tvblob.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Dear Cristiano,
one option that comes to my mind is defining the properties you use as
annotation properties, similar to the following example for dublin core:

<!-- Definition of annotation properties as required per
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/#AnnotationProperty-def -->

<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator
"/>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title"/>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/contributor"/>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/rights"/>
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/subject
"/>

Many OWL ontologies use that pattern (I actually don't know who first
proposed that, so apologies for not given explicit credit)

best
Martin


Cristiano Longo wrote:
>
> Morning all,
> I wonder to use foaf elements in my OWL DL ontology.  Do someone
> experienced  some  OLW DL foaf version? Do exists a recommended one? I
> found just   http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/site/docs/OWL_to_ACE/foaf.owl.
> What do you think about it?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Cristiano Longo
>
>
>

-- 

-----------------------------------
martin hepp, http://www.heppnetz.de
mhepp@computer.org, skype mfhepp
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:03:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:10 UTC