Carlos,
Topic maps is an ISO/IEC standard, which play a similar role than RDF
(from W3C). Nevertheless, it is not RDF based. See Lars Garshol’s
article : "Living with topic maps and RDF".
In the ISO/IEC 13250-2 "Topic Maps - Part 2: Data Model" it is used UML
(version 1.5) to depict graphically Topic Maps itens according to UML
concepts: classes, associations, aggregations, etc. But I don’t think
that it is stated anywhere that this is the standard way. The metamodel
and the data model elements are describe in textual form.
--
pfa
Tel: +351 228 340 500 | Ext: 1141 | E-mail: pfa@isep.ipp.pt
GPG Public Key: http://ave.dee.isep.ipp.pt/~passis/gpg-pub-key/
Carlos Tejo Alonso escreveu:
> Hi,
>
>
>> If by ontology you mean conceptual schema (before it is encoded into
>> owl/rdf) I recently learned that
>> topic maps are an iso standard (so, standard de jure where
>> iso jurisdiction
>> applies:-)
>>
>
> Paola, thanks for share this point. And, what is the standard graphical
> representation of a topic map?
>
> Ivan suggested :"there are a number of systems that do graphical
> representations", but each system use a different graphical
> representation as you can see [1], [2] or [3].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carlos Tejo Alonso
> R&D Deparment - CTIC Foundation [Asturias, Spain]
> www.fundacionctic.org
>
> [1] http://www.hipertexto.info/images/topicmap.gif
> [2]
> http://www.idealliance.org/papers/dx_xmle04/papers/03-01-03/03-01-03-fig
> 01.jpg
> [3] http://www.topicmap-design.com/images/Viewer.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
--
pfa
Tel: +351 228 340 500 | Ext: 1141 | E-mail: pfa@isep.ipp.pt
GPG Public Key: http://ave.dee.isep.ipp.pt/~passis/gpg-pub-key/