- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:49:39 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Hi Bijan, > From: Bijan Parsia > > On 15 Jul 2008, at 18:15, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > > > It is the *URI* that you wish to deprecate -- not the resource > > denoted by that URI, so the deprecation statement *must* > > Not really. > > > be written something like this: > > > > "http://lingvoj.org/iso-639/languages#da"^^xsd:anyURI > > owl:deprecatesURI > > > "http://downlode.org/rdf/iso-639/languages#da"^^xsd:anyURI . > > > > using "" rather than <> to indicate that you are talking about the > > URI itself, rather than the resource denoted by that URI. > > You could easily figure it out from context. > > > The Semantic Web community does not yet seem to be accustomed to > > taking about URIs themselves, > > People make use/mention slides all the time. In all sorts of context. > Sometimes it matters. Sometimes it doesn't. I don't know which it is > in this case. Certainly if you step outside of RDF there are many ways the distinction can be made. The discussion (I thought) was about how to make a deprecation statement *in* RDF. RDF has no notion of context. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 17:51:29 UTC