- From: Tom Heath <Tom.Heath@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:55:42 +0100
- To: "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: <public-lod@w3.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-lod-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-lod-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kingsley Idehen > Sent: 12 July 2008 21:43 > To: afraz.jaffri@tiscali.co.uk > Cc: public-lod@w3.org; semantic-web@w3.org > Subject: Re: Ordnance Survey data as Linked Data (RE: How do > you deprecate URIs? Re: OWL-DL and linked data) > > > Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > I also forgot to mention obvous use of RDFa in the HTML doc > which broadens the range of rdf aware user agents tha > commence RDF discovery from HTML Question: is it worth creating a duplicate RDF graph by using RDFa in HTML documents, when there is also RDF/XML available just one <link rel=".../> away, and at a distinct URI? Doesn't this RDFa + RDF/XML pattern complicate the RDF-consumption picture in general if we assume agents will want to do something with data aggregated from a number of sources/locations, i.e. doesn't it increase the cost of removing duplicate statements by creating more in the first place? Does it not also complicate the picture of making provenance statements using named graphs, if the subject of the triple could be both an HTML document and an RDF graph? Dunno the answers to these questions, but interested to hear what people think. Tom. -- Tom Heath Researcher Platform Team Talis Information Ltd T: 0870 400 5000 W: http://www.talis.com/platform
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 08:56:23 UTC