- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:04:23 +0100
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
By context we mean quite a lot more (I would call your context something like provenance, which is a part of the whole context). So we might like to say when the statements were believed to be true; what was the policy we applied to build the knowledge (did we allow false positives to avoid false negatives or vice versa, etc); is this about administrative regions or topographical regions? And then of course their is trust... On 12/07/2008 04:21, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com> wrote: For a large knowledge base like this, I think the appropriate context of a particular entry would be -- origin/source of data for that entry. Dick
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2008 20:05:15 UTC