Re: Atom Triples Internet Draft

Story Henry wrote:
[..]
> 
> if you wanted the wdrs:describedby to be automatically understood as 
> being pointing to a resource you should use the
> atom
> 
> <link rel="http://wdrsnamespace/describedby" 
> href="http://monarchy.example.org/powder2.xml/>

Thanks, Henry. I'll look at that in detail.
> 
> Otherwise things are uncontroversial.
> 
> I would need to look at what you put into the powder2.xml to see if I 
> agree with how you think you can describe the atom entries. Do you have 
> an example of that? Or is that outside of the spec? (I have not had time 
> to get a close look at powder yet)

Give us a few more days. A formal semantics document is going through 
pub rules right now which complements the two docs already referenced. 
/Then/ I hope the structure (and potential) of POWDER will be clear. As 
you've clearly picked up already, it uses a restricted XML dialect to 
transport RDF triples and OWL classes that can be unpacked and applied 
to many resources. Exactly which ones is defined by string and/or 
pattern matching against URIs.

More very soon and, if I may, a date for Silicon Valley diaries - 
Tuesday 16th September, Mission College, Santa Clara - when we'll be 
setting out our stall.

Cheers

Phil.

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 16:21:41 UTC