- From: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:21:01 +0100
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Beckett Dave <dave@dajobe.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@pobox.com>, Atom-Protocol Protocol <atom-protocol@imc.org>
Story Henry wrote: [..] > > if you wanted the wdrs:describedby to be automatically understood as > being pointing to a resource you should use the > atom > > <link rel="http://wdrsnamespace/describedby" > href="http://monarchy.example.org/powder2.xml/> Thanks, Henry. I'll look at that in detail. > > Otherwise things are uncontroversial. > > I would need to look at what you put into the powder2.xml to see if I > agree with how you think you can describe the atom entries. Do you have > an example of that? Or is that outside of the spec? (I have not had time > to get a close look at powder yet) Give us a few more days. A formal semantics document is going through pub rules right now which complements the two docs already referenced. /Then/ I hope the structure (and potential) of POWDER will be clear. As you've clearly picked up already, it uses a restricted XML dialect to transport RDF triples and OWL classes that can be unpacked and applied to many resources. Exactly which ones is defined by string and/or pattern matching against URIs. More very soon and, if I may, a date for Silicon Valley diaries - Tuesday 16th September, Mission College, Santa Clara - when we'll be setting out our stall. Cheers Phil.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 16:21:41 UTC