- From: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:22:00 +0800
- To: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Marja Koivunen" <marja@annotea.org>, "SWIG" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005c01c8615c$f2496180$1d06030a@LENOVOBB5001EF>
Re: SPARQL endpoint URIsTim, Richard and others, Yes, there is such a class (only one is found by now). The Falcons search engine (here, the Concept Search function) can help us find it: http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2005/ajar/ajaw/query#SPARQLEndpoint You can get it by visiting the followings: http://iws.seu.edu.cn/services/falcons/conceptsearch/index.jsp OR http://iws.seu.edu.cn/services/falcons/conceptsearch/queryresult.jsp?query=sparql+endpoint It shows us that the SPARQLEndpoint class is developed and owned by "dig.csail.mit.edu". Best regards, Yuzhong Qu http://iws.seu.edu.cn/ Institute of Web Science Southeast University ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Cyganiak To: Tim Berners-Lee Cc: Marja Koivunen ; SWIG Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:39 AM Subject: Re: SPARQL endpoint URIs Tim, On 19 Dec 2007, at 15:54, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > Is there an RDFS Class of SPARQL endpoints? Semantic Sitemaps are a minimalist extension of Google's Sitemap protocol [1], which is XML-based, and not RDF. So at the moment we don't define RDFS classes. Once our basic spec is finalized, we will look into making a matching RDF vocabulary and GRDDL transform. This would be nice because of RDF's natural extensibility, and there would be natural synergies with POWDER. This vocabulary would of course include a class for SPARQL endpoints. Richard [1] http://sitemaps.org/ > > > Tim > > On 2007-12 -19, at 10:36, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > >> >> >> On 19 Dec 2007, at 15:03, Marja Koivunen wrote: >>> I probably missed something in the documents but is there an easy >>> way to know that a URI is a SPARQL endpoint URI? >> >> No. That's one of the things missing from the SPARQL protocol. >> There's no way to check if a URI is a SPARQL endpoint URI except by >> sending a test query. >> >> Semantic Sitemaps [1] are designed to solve this, among other >> things. But the standard is still under active development and not >> yet widely deployed. >> >> Best, >> Richard >> >> [1] http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ >> >> >>> >>> >>> Marja >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Monday, 28 January 2008 03:22:16 UTC