Re: plural vs singular properties (a proposal)

On Jan 5, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Garret Wilson wrote:

> Frank Manola wrote:
>> In a graph of triples, there are as many relations as far as  
>> *semantics* are concerned as there are distinct predicates  
>> included in those triples (not one per resource, as you had it  
>> earlier).
> When I was describing relations based upon Date's interpretation, I  
> spoke incorrectly; I should have said "one relation per resource  
> type" (e.g. <foaf.Person>).

Date's interpretation, though, is independent of the relational  
design involved.  That is, his interpretation of what a relation  
means applies whether your design calls for a single Person relation  
(with a whole bunch of columns describing each person), or a design  
that, due to normalization requirements, involves breaking the  
description of a person up into multiple relations, e.g., a separate  
relation for associating each person with his/her relatives, or his/ 
her hobbies (this is an example of your multiple properties).

> (Multiple types per resource is a whole different can of worms that  
> I don't even want to bring up until I read a little more...)
> Garret

Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 21:24:06 UTC