Re: Call for Comments: SKOS Primer: W3C Working Draft 21 February 2008

On 29/02/2008, Richard Newman <rnewman@twinql.com> wrote:

>  I'd rather use imperfect tools, and improve them over time, than hunt
>  with flint spears until the perfect knowledge representation system
>  comes along. To return to the original email: SKOS is doubtless
>  imperfect, but it's better than the current alternative (rolling my
>  own), and it doesn't prevent Azamat from going off and building
>  something better.

+1

Reminds me of something danbri said in a similar thread about 4 years ago:

Traveller: I'd like to find my way to "Semantic Web", please.

Bystander: Well... I wouldn't start from here.


-- 
http://dannyayers.com
~
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/

Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 11:42:57 UTC