- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:49:01 +0000
- To: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
- Cc: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 9 Dec 2008, at 11:51, Norman Gray wrote: > A potential problem is that SWEET is potentially a bit too upper- > level for what it sounds like you want. True. I tried writing out a few examples, but they didn't seem quite right. Doesn't help that SWEET doesn't seem to include any rdfs:labels or rdfs:comments. For the time being, I've set up this: http://buzzword.org.uk/rdf/ungeo# But will keep reviewing alternatives. > A possible alternative is STC <http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/latest/ > STC.html>. This has a _lot_ more detail than SWEET, and is > expressly designed as a solution to the problem you describe, but > there is not as yet a great deal of software support for it. > (Also, STC is defined as an XSchema -- A subset of STC certainly seems closer. > if you're interested, I could roll you an RDFS version of it). Thanks. It's a big spec, so don't do so on my account, but if you were planning on doing it anyway, then I'd certainly be interested in the result. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 9 December 2008 12:49:41 UTC