- From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:41:48 +0000
- To: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>

On 8 Dec 2008, at 23:11, Story Henry wrote: > Hehe. Cool, but I don't know if you need to make a new class for > three dimensional points. All points are 0 dimensional, see > > http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/the_10_dimensions_of_reality Points are by definition 0-dimensional, but their position can be recorded in an N-dimensional space. Although I'm only interested in recording their position in 3 dimensions, an ontology which allows them to be recorded in N-dimensions would be fine too. > On the other hand yes, I can see that if you are using euclidian > geometry you may need specific euclidian x, y, z coordinates. Those > differ from the x, y relations of geo coordinate space, which > occurs on the surface of a sphere. The W3C geo vocab includes a "z" - altitude in metres. Essentially, the W3C geo vocab records (x,y,z) co-ordinates in one particular non- Euclidian geometry - i.e. WGS84. I am after something that does the same, but can be used in other, Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries - the ":plane" predicate would be used to state which geometry is being used. (The plane may, for example, define where the origin is, which direction the axes lie in, the units being used for each axis, plus any other pertinent information.) Norman Gray wrote: > What's your application? > The idea is that I could do things like this: <#moonbase> foaf:based_near [ a geom:Point geom:x 56.1 ; geom:y -12.9 ; geom:z 0 ; geom:plane <#lunarPlane> ] . <#lunarPlane> a geom:ReferencePlane ; rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002cosp...34E1305W> . Without having to create separate ontologies for each reference plane. > How general do you want your coordinate system to be (there's a > whole world of positively delicious complication waiting to be > explored there!) I really just want three numbers with an associated frame of reference which may be defined by a link or short descriptive text. Something like that should be simple and flexible enough to work for any three-or-less-dimensional geometry - even exotic things like co- ordinates on, below or above the surface of a torus. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>

Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 23:42:25 UTC