- From: Philipp Heim <heim@interactivesystems.info>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:14:28 +0100
- To: Andreas Langegger <al@jku.at>
- CC: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>, public-lod@w3.org, "Michael Lang(Jr.)" <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Greg Milbank <gregmilbank@revelytix.com>
Hi Andy, we are currently working on a RDF browser that supports user's understanding of available properties for further exploration. We call our browser gFacet because of the combination of graph-based visualization and faceted filtering techniques. If you are interested have a look at www.gFacet.org <http://www.gFacet.org> The demo on the webpage is limited to a dummy dataset but we are working on a version that allows browsing dbpedia. I look forward to get your opinion! Cheers Phil Andreas Langegger schrieb: > > Hi, > > thanks for all the hints! I like the schemaweb, because it uses a > crawler, but also like the other more "publisher"-oriented tools. I > was looking for a more user-oriented tool. > > Basically we have to options to access a LOD dataset: browsing (thats > what typically people do at the moment) or by SPARQL (what I'm doing). > If you go for SPARQL, you usually don't have a glue how the graph > behind looks like. That's why I would like to have some vocab browser > which helps me to get some more glue which properties I can use in my > query... > > What I'm looking for is some more graphical or intuitive view on > vocabularies around probably in some clusterd manner. On the one hand > I would like to have a web-scale clustered view, on the other hand a > view just generated from some SPARQL endpoint. > > Some vocabs are not interlinked (so different cluster here), others > heavily - either by vocab concepts explicitly like RDFS domain/range > pointing to external classes, sub-classing, equivalent property/class, > etc. or implicitly by poeple using the different vocabs. By implicitly > I mean, vocabs where the T-Box has no assertions but people typically > use it that way, especially in the RDF-only way (without RDFS and > explicit classes). > > AndyL > > On Dec 1, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > >> >> On Monday 01 December 2008, Michael Lang(Jr.) wrote: >>> www.Knoodl.com is a web-based, vocabulary browser/editor which >>> supports all that you ask for. It is publicly hosted and is free to >>> use. Let me know if you would like any more information. >> >> Oh, that's really cool! >> >> One thing I'd like to see is a comprehensive repository of vocabularies, >> sort of like http://www.schemaweb.info/ (which is a bit too sleepy for >> comfort). >> >> So, I was wondering if it might make sense if you crawl and index >> vocabularies and make them available read-only in the case where they >> reside outside of Knoodl? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kjetil >> -- >> Kjetil Kjernsmo >> Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer >> kjetil@kjernsmo.net >> Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC >> > > > http://www.langegger.at > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dipl.-Ing.(FH) Andreas Langegger > Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing > Johannes Kepler University Linz > A-4040 Linz, Altenberger Straße 69 > > > > > -- ______________________________________________________ Philipp Heim @ INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS AND INTERACTION DESIGN University of Duisburg-Essen (Campus Duisburg) Lotharstrasse 65 . Room LF 285 (Building LF) . D-47057 Duisburg Tel.: +49 (203) 379-1415 . Fax: +49 (203) 379-3557 E: heim@interactivesystems.info . http://www.interactivesystems.info
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 13:37:13 UTC