- From: Bernhard Schandl <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:37:32 +1200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@PioneerCA.com>
Richard, > I have also thought of a good way to focus on my concerns. > I will take a simple example, maybe the one offered by > James Leigh, and do a complete individual hierarchy > using all "type" and "subClassOf" links -- according to > RDF/OWL, not according to mKR. > > I hope you won't mind if I use a notation similar to mKR > to distinguish between "type" and "subClassOf" links. > I plan to show > x type y > as (that's an "i:" prefix) > y > / i:x > and > x subClassOf y > as > y > / x as an interested listener to your discussion, may I ask you to, instead of your "similar to mKR" notation, just use the common RDF/OWL vocabulary, i.e., x rdf:type y a rdfs:subClassOf b to avoid confusion. These terms are understandable to (probably) all readers of the list, and they are well defined. > I'll have the example done tomorrow. Looking forward to that. Best, Bernhard -- Web of Data Practictioners Days: Oct 22-23, Vienna, Austria <http://www.webofdata.info> -- Bernhard Schandl University of Vienna Faculty of Computer Science Department of Distributed and Multimedia Systems web : http://www.cs.univie.ac.at/bernhard.schandl phone : +43-1-4277-39621 fax : +43-1-4277-39649
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 06:38:19 UTC