- From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:44:32 +0100
- To: "Paul Tyson" <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "Holger Knublauch" <holger@knublauch.com>, "Leigh Dodds" <leigh@ldodds.com>, "semantic-web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3c.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Unfortunately sparql covers just very few processing requirements. even URI rewriting is not possible in sparql (or is it? :-) if it is its not trivial). Plus you have issues with named graphs. (how do you name the inputs etc.. that you would need to cover. I'd say it is wise to get the xml pipes finished as they are then RDF could be considered later e.g consindering the experience of the other RDF pipes project out there (deri pipes, sparqlmotion etc) my2c Giovanni On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > I submitted to public-xml-processing-model-comments a list of XProc steps > that I believe will cover most RDF processing requirements [1]. Please see > that list for further discussion. > > --Paul > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2008Aug/0024.html > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 11:45:10 UTC