Holger Knublauch <holger@knublauch.com> writes: > Having said this I very much agree with Paul's statement that having > some standard pipeline facilities for RDF would be good thing. I would > even take it further and claim that for certain application areas RDF > might be a better starting point for a pipeline system than XML. In If you defined a set of RDF-aware steps for XProc, there's nothing about XProc that would constrain their flexibility to exchange triples and operate on graphs. True, the output of one step would flow into the input of the next as RDF/XML, but that would transparent to the steps themselves. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Two starving men cannot be twice as http://nwalsh.com/ | hungry as one; but two rascals can be | ten times as vicious as one.--George | Bernard ShawReceived on Sunday, 24 August 2008 19:02:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:12 UTC