- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:28:59 -0700
- To: <cyclify-austin@YahooGroups.com>
- Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Stu Thanks for the info. I was not aware of these other projects, and I will definitely look into them. If you'd like to expand on your ideas off list, I am very interested. Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Stu Baurmann To: cyclify-austin@YahooGroups.com Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 11:43 AM Subject: Re: [cyclify-austin] Re: mKR context pipes We may be straying a bit from the cyc topic here, but I will point out the following regarding pipeline-based knowledge application architecture: 1) Cocoon is all about the (XML) pipes, which myself and others have used to construct semantic pipelines around RDF graphs and SPARQL queries. http://cocoon.apache.org/ http://groups.google.com/group/cocoon-semantic-platform It's easy to plug Saxonica into Cocoon and then you get XPath2+XSLT2 level processing in your pipelines, which is pretty swanky when combined with the power of Cocoon sitemaps. http://www.saxonica.com/ Cocoon and Saxonica will be more appealing if you have already have a good bridge to Java. Regardless, I think that taking a standards-centric approach (XML + URI + RDF) to pipeline integration might help widen the future audience for mKR, and offer a sensible pathway for using mKR, Cyc, and RDF together as part of an knowledge application platform. 2) You may want to pay some attention to the emerging XProc standard for XML Processing pipelines. http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/ http://xproc.org/ > > > > 3. mKR pipes (not yet implemented) > > In the typical mKR pipeline, each mKR method has a context > > as its standard input and standard output. The mKR methods > > act as context filters. > > > > The mKR syntax will look like this > > > > at context | do filter1 done | do filter2 done | ... | do > > filterN done; > > > > 4. Comments, any one? __._,_.___ Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe Visit Your Group Yahoo! Finance It's Now Personal Guides, news, advice & more. Ads on Yahoo! Learn more now. Reach customers searching for you. Yahoo! Groups Wellness Spot A resource for Curves and weight loss. . __,_._,___
Received on Saturday, 23 August 2008 20:31:26 UTC