- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:45:19 +0100
- To: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>, public-sparql-dev@w3.org, ndw@nwalsh.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 22 Aug 2008, at 04:02, Paul Tyson wrote: > > XProc [1] is in Last Call, and as it stands has no built-ins for RDF > processing. Do any in the community agree with me that having some > standard pipeline facilities for RDF processing would be a good thing? Given the situation, and what others have said, the only thing I'd like is a way to construct query strings, which would make sparql nicer to work with. To explain, currently it seems like you'd do: <p:document href="http://example.com/rq? query=.............encoded.noise............."/> Which is entirely functional, but not very readable. Any chance of: <p:document href="http://example.com/rq"> <param name="query"> SELECT * WHERE .... </param> </p:document> ? I suggest this on the basis of a very cursory glance at xproc. Apologies if this possible already. Damian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkiwBmAACgkQAyLCB+mTtykRUACg6ZYDYAJo2BKOR90RD2gaQzEq uZoAoPlwEfnX/HTUCyFDYS5nqB+SC1uE =In35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Saturday, 23 August 2008 12:46:17 UTC