- From: Michiel Hildebrand <Michiel.Hildebrand@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:00:44 +0200
- To: "Aldo Bucchi" <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 21 aug 2008, at 02:31, Aldo Bucchi wrote: > > HI, > > Scanning the thread on Parallax I see some terms reoccurring: > > Outgoing Connections. > Lenses. > Lists. > Facets. > Free text search. > IFP to IRI resolution. > Find documents that contain IRIs > etc... > > They are all implemented in different ways but tend to share semantics > across different browsers and services. > How far are we from defining a modular framework so we can mix and > math these as atomic interaction pieces? Within the MultimediaN E-Culture project I have been working on interface widgets for a while now. Several of the components, facet navigation, result views and autocompletion that were part of /facet are now becoming modular widgets that handle their own interaction and fetch data through an API. Currently I am still developing for the API's that we provide within our own server side software, ClioPatria [1]. I would love to make variants were we use SPARQL instead. Any suggestions for a SPARQL endpoint that supports JSON? Michiel p.s. this thread makes me wake up an hour earlier and go to bed an hour later
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 09:00:46 UTC