W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Modular Browsers (was RE: freebase parallax: user interface for browsing graphs of data)

From: Michiel Hildebrand <Michiel.Hildebrand@cwi.nl>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:00:44 +0200
Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <87CD746D-E97A-4908-867C-121BCDD72A17@cwi.nl>
To: "Aldo Bucchi" <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>

On 21 aug 2008, at 02:31, Aldo Bucchi wrote:

> HI,
> Scanning the thread on Parallax I see some terms reoccurring:
> Outgoing Connections.
> Lenses.
> Lists.
> Facets.
> Free text search.
> IFP to IRI resolution.
> Find documents that contain IRIs
> etc...
> They are all implemented in different ways but tend to share semantics
> across different browsers and services.
> How far are we from defining a modular framework so we can mix and
> math these as atomic interaction pieces?

Within the MultimediaN E-Culture project I have been working on  
interface widgets for a while now.
Several of the components, facet navigation, result views and  
autocompletion that were part of /facet are now becoming modular  
widgets that handle their own interaction and fetch data through an API.

Currently I am still developing for the API's that we provide within  
our own server side software, ClioPatria [1].
I would love to make variants were we use SPARQL instead.
Any suggestions for a SPARQL endpoint that supports JSON?


p.s. this thread makes me wake up an hour earlier and go to bed an  
hour later
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 09:00:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:47:42 UTC