- From: David Huynh <dfhuynh@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:27:54 -0700
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3c.org
Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > On 2008-08 -17, at 04:02, David Huynh wrote: >> I can also explain that distinction in a different way. Parallax is >> intended to be a browser, not a query builder. Personally, to me a >> query builder implies a closed-world database where there are few >> types and how these types are connected is understood by the user. >> For example, the database might contain data about publications, >> authors, and conferences. The user is assumed to be aware of how >> those types are connected. The query builder can then let the user >> specify patterns to match this closed graph by presenting the query >> graph in some visual way. Now, if we're dealing with an open world >> instead, then I don't think a query graph, and hence, a query >> builder, is suitable conceptually. Parallax embodies a browsing >> paradigm instead of a query building paradigm. > This is the issue which Tabulator addresses, really. See [1]. I > felt the dichotomy wasn't between browsing and query-building but > browsing and analyzing something something one has found. Hence, the name "Tabulator", I suppose :) > The transition in tabulator comes when you have browsed a and found > and selected a subgraph and then you ask for a view of all similar > subgraphs out there in the web, with the button we now call 'find > all'. (As you have to first select a set of fields, it isn't > intuitive for the newbie. -- I like your "what on earth just > happened?" popups! Maybe it needs one of those.) The generation of > the query is query by example. It is similar, but freebase parallax > allows you to follow any relationship which presidents have, rather > than picking a specific president as an example and then generalizing. > This avoids problems of finding an example which uncharacteristically > doesn't have the direction you want. The trouble is of course when the whole web is the database, it's hard to suggest those relationships (connections) for a set of entities. How might one solve that problem? I suppose something like Swoogle can help. Is that what Tabulator uses to know what data is on the SW? David
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 01:29:28 UTC