- From: carmen r <_@whats-your.name>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:35:11 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3c.org
> All I ask of you is the exposure of the Freebase URLs that are already in > sight re. the current / basic Freebase pages. "javascript:{}" is neither > URL nor URI. Brendan disagrees, at least: "They were a deliberate feature in this sense: I invented the javascript: URL along with JavaScript in 1995, and intended that javascript: URLs could be used as any other kind of URL, including being bookmark-able." [1] wikipedia:bookmarklet i'd agree javascript:{} is uninformative how about some MQL JSON in there? freebase:{} would be preferable, as well the useragent can provide the context so such URIs do something useful also GUIDs make baby jesus cry > > << > The ?people operated? side of things is the world we live in today. As > David Huynh?s video discusses, we busy ourselves manually searching by > keyword in multiple locations and then compile our results. > >> > > Yes, we may be "less busy" as a result of nice UI (visualization or > interaction) but the ultimate goal is stimulation of our inherent cognitive > prowess. Thus, also offer users of these UIs an optional route to the raw > data. On the Web that's simply about URIs or URLs. A stimulated human is an > inquisitive human, and an inquisitive human will ultimately seek to explore > dimensions associated with observation, perception, and comprehension. > >> (the talkback comments are also valuable) > Can't comment on zdnet as they still require completion of a full > subscription interview first, no OpenID or the like in sight :-( > >> >> http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/freebase_parallax_taunts_us_wi.php > No comment, I think that article speaks for itself. From my vantage point, > readwriteweb is still grappling with the fundamentals of what comes after > REST APIs. > >> >> >> http://blog.futurefacts.net/2008/08/14/future-web-freebase-%E2%80%93-killing-google-with-semantic-precision/ > That article is another variant of the readwrite article re. overall > comprehension. > > None of them answered the question re. Linked or Semantic Web relevance, > because none of them seem to understand the essence of either. For > instance, they don't see how "Networking" is the constant while points of > reference (network entry points) vary over time; we started with Routers > (eons ago) and now we are dealing with Entities across Data Spaces [1][2]. >> >> Those are their opinions alone. I include them here to provide various >> perspectives. > > Here is my basic opinion: > > I don't have an issue with the UI, it's nice, cool, and innovative. I just > want it to be part of the Web. Being part of the Web is about accepting > that "Linkage" is sacrosanct. Thus, no silos, no matter how pretty, cool, > or innovative. > > Your visualization is how I would lead a user to a beachead point in the > underlying graph so that they could beam a SPARQL + Full Text pattern query > down the graph without them ever writing or seeing a line of SPARQL. > > Question: Is there any fundamental reason why you cannot expose URIs or > URLs where you have "javascript:{}"? Would this break your work in anyway? > If you expose the URIs, I would then be able to demonstrate what I mean > using your nice UI, how about that? > > Links: > > 1. > http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/presentations/Creating_Deploying_Exploiting_Linked_Data2/Creating_Deploying_Exploiting_Linked_Data2_TimBL_v3.html#(15) > -- Start > 2. > http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/presentations/Creating_Deploying_Exploiting_Linked_Data2/Creating_Deploying_Exploiting_Linked_Data2_TimBL_v3.html#(22) > -- Where we are headed > > Note: > The presentation above is a remix of presentations by TimBL and I from the > recent Linked Data Planet conference. You've forced my hand re. publication > as this remix is also about demonstrating RDFa virtues amongst other things > re. the Linked Data Web :-) > >> >> Best, >> >> David >> >> > > > -- > > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > > >
Received on Friday, 15 August 2008 04:36:01 UTC