- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:21:47 -0700
- To: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "Adam Pease" <adampease@earthlink.net>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Over the last six years, I have suggested a number of "improvements" to the RDF language. Not one of my suggestions was adopted. Apparently, RDF is fine just the way is, thank you! I would now like to turn the tables, and ask why do you want to do that? I'll start with two features of RDF which seem to be popular. 1. X subClassOf X; A neat mathematical property, right? But if you do the inferences, what it means is X sameAs X; We already knew that. Why do you want to do that? 2. X type Y; X subClassOf Z; Another neat property: X is an individual and a class. Now I can ... What? I don't know. Why do you want to do that? Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 15:25:48 UTC