- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:21:47 -0700
- To: "Semantic Web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "Adam Pease" <adampease@earthlink.net>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Over the last six years, I have suggested a number of
"improvements" to the RDF language. Not one of
my suggestions was adopted. Apparently,
RDF is fine just the way is, thank you!
I would now like to turn the tables, and ask
why do you want to do that?
I'll start with two features of RDF
which seem to be popular.
1. X subClassOf X;
A neat mathematical property, right?
But if you do the inferences, what it means is
X sameAs X;
We already knew that.
Why do you want to do that?
2. X type Y; X subClassOf Z;
Another neat property: X is an individual and a class.
Now I can ... What? I don't know.
Why do you want to do that?
Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 15:25:48 UTC