- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:56:16 +0100
- To: "Emanuele D'Arrigo" <manu3d@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web Interest Group <semantic-web@w3.org>
Follow ups to SWIG please. On 26 Sep 2007, at 10:13, Emanuele D'Arrigo wrote: > Hi everybody! > > Has any consensus been reached on the architecture for efficient > storage > and retrieval of an ontology's triples? I don't think there will be consensus for a very long time. There's a lot of issues and trade offs. However, you might find this paper worth your while: http://139.91.183.30:9090/RDF/publications/RBenchFinal.pdf > I've read an interesting paper about a triple store based on hashed > tables > that intuitively sounded more efficient than a straightforward > one-table approach. One thing to remember, as well, as that there are join algorithms tuned for lots of self joins. They just aren't commonly implemented (e.g., stripe-join). Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 09:54:53 UTC