- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:37:40 -0700
- To: cdr <_@whats-your.name>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
You should send your markup to public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org and we'll help you debug it. You may well have found edge cases we haven't considered yet, which would certainly help our test cases. > 1) is RDFa really supposed to be valid XML? why? XHTML1.1+RDFa is supposed to be valid XML, because we're working within the confines of XHTML1.1. Ideally, we'll find a way to make RDFa work in non-XML versions of HTML, but that's not part of our current scope. > 2) its impossible to exactly roundtrip content If you're trying to round-trip non-well-formed markup, XHTML1.1+RDFa is likely not going to be right for you, mostly because you're dealing with, as you've discovered, the confines of XHTML. But if you have well-formed markup, or just plain literals, it should be trivial to round-trip it. Do you have a specific use case in mind that we're not handling well? -Ben chair, RDFa task force.
Received on Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:37:45 UTC