- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:42:14 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: n2-dev@googlegroups.com
Apologies if this came up already, but it just occurred to me that
there probably a JSON/RDF format already implied by a W3C Note:
Serializing SPARQL Query Results with JSON
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/
the graph serialization being the result of:
select ?subject ?predicate ?object
where { ?subject ?predicate ?object }
example (which I got from http://sparql.org/query.html ):
{
"head": {
"vars": [ "subject" , "predicate" , "object" ]
} ,
"results": {
"bindings": [
{
"subject": { "type": "uri" , "value":
"http://example.org/book/book7" } ,
"predicate": { "type": "uri" , "value":
"http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title" } ,
"object": { "type": "literal" , "value": "Harry Potter and the
Deathly Hallows" }
} ,
...
]
}
}
It'd be nice for SPARQL results and JSON/RDF viewers/processors to
have whatever interop is available, so I'd suggest that an obligatory
task with anyone proposing a new JSON/RDF format would be to write
converters to/from SPARQL results...
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 10:42:18 UTC