- From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:20:53 -0400
- To: bnowack@semsol.com
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, Keith Alexander <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>, "Richard Newman" <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Benjamin Nowack wrote: > On 05.09.2007 18:04:48, Keith Alexander wrote: >>> >>> Can you nest these structures? >> >> No. > Let me add that this is an important feature, not a > limitation. We've yet to see an agreed-on "RDF/XML Light" > due to differing opinions and priorities, but one thing > everyone agreed on was that a simplified RDF/XML should > not have nested structures beyond s->p->o. That only makes sense if you want to exclude blank nodes. The biggest problem with RDF/XML from an XML perspective is that a property can be represented either with an attribute or an element. While removing that option doesn't get rid of all the variability, it does get rid of a lot of it. Bruce
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:19:39 UTC