- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 04:58:04 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: K-fe bom <u9x3n_15so@hotmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
As a minor point, I don't think that the reification semantics are undefined. Rather they are well defined, but extremely weak. However, the end result, not useful for interoperability, is, I think, the same. As for public use of reification, the current OWL 1.1 proposal uses it in the RDF translation for axiom annotations. http:// www.webont.org/owl/1.1/ -Alan On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:53 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > There isn't really any hope of getting interoperability with > reification, no matter what way you use it, because its semantics > are undefined and different people tried to use it quite > differently. You'll have trouble finding any published RDF that > uses reification, though some applications use it to good effect > internally.
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 08:58:26 UTC