- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:42:22 +0100
- To: <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>, "Lloyd Rutledge" <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "Max Wilson" <mlw05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <editor@content-wire.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, <emmanuelle@sidar.org>, "T.Heath" <T.Heath@open.ac.uk>, "SW-forum Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, <public-semweb-ui@w3.org>
Hey people. Just was talking to Paola and would like to express my support. I'm in favour for setting up an IG. Next steps? Cheers, Michael PS: And Paola sitting right next to me says she enjoys the food and the drinks very much ;) ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA ---------------------------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: public-semweb-ui-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-semweb-ui-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > paola.dimaio@gmail.com > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:54 PM > To: Lloyd Rutledge > Cc: Max Wilson; <editor@content-wire.com>; Ivan Herman; > emmanuelle@sidar.org; T.Heath; SW-forum Web; public-semweb-ui@w3.org > Subject: Re: Semantic Web Usability BOF in Busan > > Brilliant Lloyd thanks > I will arrive late afternoon, around 7, could not find > another flight so please take notes and keep us all posted > about the tutorial, will catch up in the evening or on > arrival If there is a post tutorial event/get together, > please drop me an email here and I ll join you thanks PDM > > On 11/10/07, Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl> wrote: > > Another gathering point for this discussion could be the at > or aronnd > > the tutorial tomorrow (Sunday) on "User Centered Design for > the Semantic Web" > > <http://www.dfki.de/~jameson/iswc07-tutorial/>. > > > > -Lloyd > > > > Max Wilson wrote: > > > This swuiwiki.webscience.org, which is a great place to > output any > > > user based BOF discussion at ISWC this year, has a managed editor > > > list but is free to view by anyone. Contact details for > getting an > > > editor account are on the front page. Roberto, and now > Paola, along > > > with many some now have accounts. > > > > > > Max Wilson > > > > > > On 10 Nov 2007, at 09:51, <editor@content-wire.com > > > <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>> <editor@content-wire.com > > > <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Ivan and all > > >> me too leaving soon and still working on my reservations, > > >> shutingdown in a few minutes... > > >> > > >> Preliminary list of issues on the fly: > > >> > > >> 1. New semantic web tools are being released (primarily > RDF based > > >> but Ontology editors and othe semantic technologiesr too) that > > >> look as if they are promising and useful but little or no > > >> 'usability good practices' is in place to make such applications > > >> useful to those who have never seen one before (ie the > majority > > >> of the intended users) > > >> > > >> People (non developers) dont know > > >> a) what to do with theb > > >> b) how to do it > > >> > > >> 2. you can look at all the usability issues that once > existed about > > >> web 1.0, great advances have been made there in term of internet > > >> usability/accessibility, so that now even grandparents > can manage > > >> to check emails without prior knowledge - we are in a > similar phase > > >> with semantic web applications, we (non developers, otherwise > > >> intelligent - users with different operational business > and other > > >> IT background not RDF) need/want to learn how to use > them and give > > >> feedback to developers, but they cant. They also feel a little > > >> helpless and stupid in the process, typical symptoms of poor > > >> usability > > >> > > >> Semantic technologies are now designed to be used by specialists > > >> (understandable as these are mostly alpha/beta, but as > they become > > >> more and more pervasive, also their usability must increase) > > >> > > >> 3. Genral lack of guidelines, how to's and comprehensive list of > > >> tutorials and support for people who would like to use > the things, > > >> as well as for developers who dont know what seem to understand > > >> what the issues are. Sometimes semantic web tools appear > mysterious > > >> in appearance and functionality to the uninitated. > > >> > > >> > > >> I think in the BOF we could aim to expand the above list > of 'issues' > > >> with inputs from different viewpoints, identify what is > the cause > > >> of lack of usability, discuss possible initiatives that could > > >> increase usability, including possibly some futuristic web based > > >> application/service to collect all the user comments > from semantic > > >> test environments and gather them in a repository that could be > > >> used to develop tutorials (support the users) as well as > guidelines > > >> (help the developers develop more friendly tools following > > >> appropriate guidelines). Anything else that interested > contributors > > >> feel should be added/discussed > > >> > > >> > > >> Wiki > > >> > > >> I tried to log into Roberto's suggested wiki, but cannot > creat an > > >> account (the option login/create account only leads to a login > > >> screen, not a create account one) I have already written > to Robert > > >> about it > > >> > > >> Could not find conference wiki > > >> > > >> Any wiki where I can write to would be good at stage, if you can > > >> set one up quickly on the way to the airport and post > the contents > > >> of this message, if we dont hear from Roberto otherwise, > would be > > >> fine for me > > >> > > >> Thanks Ivan and all > > >> Please note that your reply if you dont cc my gmail > > >> > > >> > > >> look forward > > >> > > >> PDM > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org > > >> <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> > > >> To: <editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>> > > >> Cc: <emmanuelle@sidar.org > <mailto:emmanuelle@sidar.org>>; "'T.Heath'" > > >> <T.Heath@open.ac.uk <mailto:T.Heath@open.ac.uk>>; > "'SW-forum Web'" > > >> <semantic-web@w3.org <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>> > > >> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:29 PM > > >> Subject: Re: Semantic Web Usability BOF in Busan > > >> > > >> > > >> Setting up a wiki page on ESW is not a problem; but Roberto > > >> referred to an existing page already. Whichever people > feel is better. > > >> > > >> I would still like to understand the issues first. > > >> > > >> Is there some sort of a wiki or other option set up for ISWC > > >> participants? It would be a good place to organize such ad hoc > > >> get-togethers... I have tried to find at the ISWC page, but have > > >> not found any. > > >> > > >> Ivan > > >> > > >> P.S. Leaving for Korea in about 5 hours... > > >> > > >> editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com> wrote: > > >>> Dear Ivan and all > > >>> > > >>> thanks for the interest in this issue it will be good to meet > > >>> > > >>> It looks like from the responses so far that we have some > > >>> momentum, and considering I cannot quite help with the > debugging > > >>> of the applications just as yet , I ll be happy to help > foster a > > >>> plan > > >>> > > >>> Is there a W3C wiki page dedicated to Usability of Semantic Web > > >>> where I can post some notes? If not shall I open a wiki > elsewhere? > > >>> Thanks > > >>> > > >>> The people who have expressed explicit interest so far are > > >>> Emmanuelle Sidar Tom Heath Open U Knud Hinner Deri M > Daquin Open > > >>> U Hugh Glaser Roberto Garcia J Chetwynd Richard Cygniak Ivan > > >>> Herman (update this list if I missed anyone) Adrian Walker sent > > >>> some notes (havent read yet) [1] > > >>> > www.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Pres > > >>> entation.pdf > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Except for those who are not in Busan, whom we shall > keep posted > > >>> of any discussions and outcomes on list, I look forward to be > > >>> meeting everybody in the next few days > > >>> > > >>> Tom Heath suggests a BOF meeting at lunch on Thursday, > which may > > >>> be fine for some but others may have flown already by then, so > > >>> anyone who can make it for lunch contact Tom directly to get > > >>> details/directions > > >>> > > >>> I hope that maybe an additional/alternative informal > get together > > >>> before Thursday an be arranged, for those who still > have a spare > > >>> slot and may have left by Thursday - email your availability > > >>> and/or just catch me ( I ll try to wear a tshirt that says > > >>> SEMANTIC USABILITY if I can get it printed on the fly) > > >>> > > >>> i am best contacted via paola.dimaio ATDONOTSPAMMEANYMORE > > >>> gmail.com, but cannot post to list from there > > >>> > > >>> With the OK of the organisers, I will put up a notice on the > > >>> conference message board about details > > >>> > > >>> Look forward! > > >>> Thanks a lot for interest > > >>> > > >>> Cheers > > >>> Paola Di Maio > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org > > >>> <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> > > >>> To: <editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>> > > >>> Cc: <emmanuelle@sidar.org > <mailto:emmanuelle@sidar.org>>; "'T.Heath'" > > >>> <T.Heath@open.ac.uk <mailto:T.Heath@open.ac.uk>>; > "'SW-forum Web'" > > >>> <semantic-web@w3.org <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>> > > >>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:01 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: Semantic Web Usability BOF in Busan > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I will be there. And I would like to understand the issues and > > >>> whether W3C is in position to do something about those. > > >>> > > >>> Note that W3C has been facing the issue of usability for a long > > >>> time (Semantic or not Semantic Web) but we could never > get enough > > >>> member enthusiasm to start something more serious in > the area.... > > >>> (except for the web accessibility area which probably > includes a > > >>> subset of the general usability issues). > > >>> > > >>> Ivan > > >>> > > >>> editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I think Tom and I and others may meet in Busan next > week, this is > > >>>> something I ll put in my agenda too to instigate about. Anyone > > >>>> else on this list is going to be in Busan, and has an > interest in > > >>>> Usability and Accessibility and related issues, please mail me > > >>>> online and I ll post details of any time/place > suggested for an > > >>>> informal get together to scheme something up cheers > Paola Di Maio > > >>>> www.mfu.ac.th > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Emmanuelle > Gutiérrez y Restrepo" > > >>>> <emmanuelle@sidar.org <mailto:emmanuelle@sidar.org>> > > >>>> To: "'T.Heath'" <T.Heath@open.ac.uk > <mailto:T.Heath@open.ac.uk>>; > > >>>> <editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>>; > > >>>> "'SW-forum Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org > > >>>> <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>> > > >>>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:01 AM > > >>>> Subject: RE: User testing for semantic applicatons > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi Tom and all, > > >>>> > > >>>> Yes, you are right, and it has not been my intention, "tar you > > >>>> all with the same brush". > > >>>> But I know a lot of developers of semantics > applications, which > > >>>> are nice, intelligent, and whom I greatly appreciate; > And yet not > > >>>> often worry about the accessibility of his creatures. > > >>>> > > >>>> I think that the Paola's idea can be useful. We are working in > > >>>> some similar, so maybe we can work on it togheter. > > >>>> > > >>>> And we can think in another ideas. But I think that > the W3C has > > >>>> some type of responsability on it too. And I'm sure > that they can > > >>>> do something about it. > > >>>> > > >>>> All the best, > > >>>> Emmanuelle > > >>>> > > >>>> Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo Fundación Sidar > Coordinadora > > >>>> del SIDAR www.sidar.org <http://www.sidar.org> > > >>>> Email: coordina@sidar.org <mailto:coordina@sidar.org> > > >>>> Tel.: +34 - 91 725 71 47 > > >>>> > > >>>> -----Mensaje original----- > > >>>> De: T.Heath [mailto:T.Heath@open.ac.uk] Enviado el: > miércoles, > > >>>> 07 de noviembre de 2007 16:04 > > >>>> Para: emmanuelle@sidar.org <mailto:emmanuelle@sidar.org>; > > >>>> editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>; > > >>>> SW-forum Web > > >>>> Asunto: RE: User testing for semantic applicatons > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi Emmanuelle, > > >>>> > > >>>> I understand and share your apparent frustration, but please > > >>>> don't "tar us all with the same brush" [1] :) There are many > > >>>> people working in the Semantic Web field who care deeply about > > >>>> understanding, and catering to, the needs of human users (yes, > > >>>> you and I agree, humans are the Semantic Web's ultimate target > > >>>> audience). Last year's SWUI workshop at ISWC [2] and > the next in > > >>>> the series [3] at CHI2008 are good indicators of this > commitment. > > >>>> > > >>>> Sadly, and despite this, the human agenda doesn't > always get the > > >>>> recognition it deserves in the community. Some additional > > >>>> initiatives in this area would be a great idea I think :) > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> > > >>>> Tom. > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/tar+with+the+same+brush > > >>>> [2] http://swui.semanticweb.org/swui06/ > > >>>> [3] http://swui.semanticweb.org/SWUI2008CHI/ > > >>>> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- > > >>>> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org > > >>>> <mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org> on behalf of Emmanuelle > > >>>> Gutiérrez y > > >>>> Restrepo > > >>>> Sent: Wed 07/11/2007 12:27 PM > > >>>> To: editor@content-wire.com <mailto:editor@content-wire.com>; > > >>>> 'SW-forum Web' > > >>>> Subject: RE: User testing for semantic applicatons > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi "PDM", > > >>>> > > >>>> I agree with you. There are a lot of work around the "semantic > > >>>> web" and maybe is a good work for the "machines". But I can't > > >>>> understand why the people working on it don't care about > > >>>> accessibility. The semantic web is nothing if can't be > useful for the humans. > > >>>> > > >>>> Accessibility means usability for all. So, I think > that complain > > >>>> with the WCAG must be *prerequisite* for each semantic web > > >>>> application. > > >>>> > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo Fundación Sidar > > >>>> Coordinadora del SIDAR www.sidar.org > > >>>> Email: coordina@sidar.org <mailto:coordina@sidar.org> > > >>>> Tel.: +34 - 91 725 71 47 > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _____ > > >>>> > > >>>> De: semantic-web-request@w3.org > > >>>> [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] En nombre de > > >>>> editor@content-wire.com > <mailto:editor@content-wire.com> Enviado > > >>>> el: miércoles, 07 de noviembre de > > >>>> 2007 11:40 > > >>>> Para: SW-forum Web > > >>>> Asunto: User testing for semantic applicatons > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I must say something > > >>>> There are a lot of cool applications coming up, I try most of > > >>>> them , but they are new I am not sure what to expect > exactly. What should it do? > > >>>> How do > > >>>> I know if there is an error, or if this is really the way it > > >>>> should look? > > >>>> Little documentation, usability almost not taken into > account etc. > > >>>> Also I dont have all day, just a few minutes, a few > clicks, then > > >>>> I lose interest, must move on > > >>>> > > >>>> Now, the linked data below is quite straighforward intuitive > > >>>> interface (not bad in fact) although a few more > explanations and > > >>>> how to's would be good. I also got an error when I tried it > > >>>> (different from the error below) not sure what to do next > > >>>> > > >>>> All this to suggest a forum is created to handle usability of > > >>>> semantic applications, where we 'users' can report our > > >>>> experiences and get some help in running/understanding the > > >>>> stuffs. I have a lot of feedback and user tests > already running > > >>>> on semantic applications, may be most productive if handled > > >>>> collectively and shared, rather than just sent to the > developers > > >>>> who are likely not to understand my problem anyway (we seem to > > >>>> speak different > > >>>> languages) > > >>>> > > >>>> thoughts? > > >>>> cheers > > >>>> PDM > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>>> From: Tim Berners-Lee <mailto:timbl@w3.org> > > >>>> To: Hugh Glaser <mailto:hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > > >>>> Cc: Linking Open Data > <mailto:linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu> > > >>>> ; SW-forum Web <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org> ; Ian > > >>>> <mailto:icm@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Millard > > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:15 AM > > >>>> Subject: Re: Linked Data available > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Umm ,,, in > > >>>> > http://nsf.rkbexplorer.com/data/person-6092a2a72319fc9437583fb2d0 > > >>>> 4733ea > > >>>> I > > >>>> get > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Request for > > >>>> > http://nsf.rkbexplorer.com/data/person-6092a2a72319fc9437583fb2d0 > > >>>> 4733eaabout > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> under the hood > > >>>> Label Request for > > >>>> > http://nsf.rkbexplorer.com/data/person-6092a2a72319fc9437583fb2d0 > > >>>> 4733ea > > >>>> Status 200 > > >>>> StatusText OK > > >>>> Accept-ranges bytes > > >>>> Connection close > > >>>> Content-length 2005 > > >>>> Content type text/xml > > >>>> Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:27:37 GMT Etag > > >>>> "7785ba-7d5-43e4bd0f48e00" > > >>>> Last-modified Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:27:36 GMT Server > Apache/2.0.52 > > >>>> (Red > > >>>> Hat) > > >>>> Handler opt off expandfetchSourceFetcher.XMLHandler > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Something funny about the XML: Line 2: doctype broken. Shoud > > >>>> not be a doctype. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [ > > >>>> <!ENTITY rdf > 'http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY rdfs 'http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY owl 'http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY akt 'http://www.aktors.org/ontology/portal#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY akts 'http://www.aktors.org/ontology/support#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY extn > 'http://www.aktors.org/ontology/extension#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY wiki 'http://resist.ecs.soton.ac.uk/wiki/'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY resist > > >>>> 'http://resist.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ontologies/resist#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY resex > > >>>> > 'http://resist.ecs.soton.ac.uk/ontologies/resilience-mechanisms#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY courseware > > >>>> 'http://www.resist-noe.org/ontology/courseware#'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY dc 'http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'> > > >>>> <!ENTITY dct 'http://purl.org/dc/terms/'> ]> <rdf:RDF > > >>>> xmlns:rdf="&rdf;" > > >>>> xmlns:rdfs="&rdfs;" > > >>>> xmlns:owl="&owl;" > > >>>> xmlns:akt="&akt;" > > >>>> xmlns:akts="&akts;" > > >>>> xmlns:extn="&extn;" > > >>>> xmlns:wiki="&wiki;" > > >>>> xmlns:resist="&resist;" > > >>>> xmlns:resex="&resex;" > > >>>> xmlns:courseware="&courseware;" > > >>>> xmlns:dc="&dc;" > > >>>> xmlns:dct="&dct;" > > >>>> > > > >>>> <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> [....] > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > > >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: > > >> http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > > >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > > n - max wilson > > > e - mlw05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:mlw05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk> w - > > > www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mlw05r <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mlw05r> > > > t - +44 (0) 2380 598367 > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > -- > Paola Di Maio > School of IT > www.mfu.ac.th > ********************************************* >
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 10:42:54 UTC