Re: Semantic web discussions

I guess I initially said yes, but given this great list, and the rest of the
thread an opinions, why change / segment / make more of a mess of it.

Thank you all,

t

On 5/18/07, Chris Wilper <cwilper@cs.cornell.edu> wrote:
>
>  Danny said:
> > Slightly less Draconian would be perhaps for the
> > algorithm to be applied and any announcement-like
> > posts it identified would get [ANN] automatically
> > inserted in the subject line.
>
> +1...I think this would send a better message.
>
> I just scrolled back through a view pages of my archive of the list and
> came up with the following probable indicators of an announcement (in the
> subject line):
>
> cfp
> call for participation
> call for papers
> deadline extension
> deadline extended
> extended deadline
> workshop
> conference
> newsletter
> announcement
> announcing
> ann:
>
> fwiw, a starting point for anyone looking at implementing a simple filter.
>
> - Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org on behalf of Danny Ayers
> Sent: Fri 5/18/2007 11:41 AM
> To: Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: T.Heath; semantic-web@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Semantic web discussions
>
>
> On 17/05/07, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > There seem to be subcommunities both that want, and do not want,
> > announcements.
> >
> > A modified version of my previous proposal would be a policy that all
> > announcements must start with ANN: (or some other defined tag).
>
> Slightly less Draconian would be perhaps for the algorithm to be
> applied and any announcement-like posts it identified would get [ANN]
> automatically inserted in the subject line.
>
> Another few lines of code and the original author could be notified
> and told that resending with the line "this is not an announcement"
> will get it past the filter...
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
> --
>
> http://dannyayers.com
>
>
>