- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:30:34 -0400
- To: <john.nj.davies@bt.com> <john.nj.davies@bt.com>
- Cc: "James (Software Escalations) Lynn" <james.lynn@hp.com>, "r.j.koppes" <rikkert@rikkertkoppes.com>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 2007-06 -06, at 10:59, <john.nj.davies@bt.com> <john.nj.davies@bt.com> wrote: >>> is it unacceptable to use it as a URI >>> for oneself? >> >> It is very acceptable to use "http://www.example.com/mophor#me" as a > URI for oneself. >> Recomended, in fact. You should have one. >> >> Mine is http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i > > Agreed - but something that has puzzled me - shouldn't the URI > scheme be > something other than 'http' (on the assumption that you are not an > html > resource!)? > No, HTTP is the ideal thing. My business cardx is an information resource. It is not actually available in HTML, but is available in RDF. ***** Please note the '#'. The hash means in this case "That which is denoted by 'i' in <http:// www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card> This is the semantic web architecture. Tim PS: Please do not use the old www-rdf-interest list. Note I have switched this to the current list.
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 17:30:40 UTC