- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:42:20 +0200
- To: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xmlhacker.com>
- Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, r.j.koppes <rikkert@rikkertkoppes.com>, "Yuzhong Qu" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, swick@w3.org, phayes@ihmc.us
- Message-ID: <29af5e2d0706091942q1a2ad99al42e3f1c2cc76ace5@mail.gmail.com>
Suppose I use http://mdavid.name in some rdf triple. How am I supposed to know whether it refers to the web page or the person. For example: :alan :cantlocate <http://mdavid.name> Do I mean that e.g. your server is broken, or that I knocked on your door and you weren't there? -Alan On 6/10/07, M. David Peterson <m.david@xmlhacker.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 07:13:52 -0600, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > > > No. It cannot identify both a document and a person. > > Tim: Will all due respect... WTF? > > Wait, hold up. Let me step back. I have a *DEEP* admiration and respect > for you. Always have. As such, I have to step back and realize there is > obviously a reason why you have made this statement. With this in mind, > > http://mdavid.name > > At this URI you will find my personal web page. That web page links to my > various blogs and projects that exist on the web. > > Embedded into this page is an OpenID delegation that specifies "Here's who > I am. Here's where you can go to invoke an authentication process that, > when complete, provides reasonable assurance that I am the person who > maintains control of that particular URI (mdavid.name) and as such I > should be allowed access to perform the various operations I have been > given permission to perform on your web site." > > So we have a web page that represents me. > > Embedded in that web page is the necessary information for an OpenID > authentication service to access the necessary information that allows a > web site that supports OpenID to authenticate me as the person who > presently maintains control of that domain. > > Same HTML. Two different purposes. Both served. > > > No. It cannot identify both a document and a person. > > Why? Are you suggesting that what I have done -- i.e. used a domain I > presently maintain control over to provide information embedded into the > same document intended to serve different purposes, and do so quite > legitamatelly and successfully -- is in fact, wrong? If yes, how so? It > works and works well. Nothing has been broken as a result, and the same > URI had identified both a document and a person. > > Care to ellaborate. > > -- > /M:D > > M. David Peterson > http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | > http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155 > >
Received on Sunday, 10 June 2007 02:42:28 UTC