Garret Wilson wrote: > Ivan, > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> Garret Wilson wrote: >> [snip] >> >>> Let me stress that I would like the RDF 2.0 effort and the RDF vCard >>> effort to advance in parallel, so that RDF 2.0 in no way holds up RDF >>> vCard. I've already provided Harry with a new RDF vCard update, which I >>> hope to see publicly soon. >>> >>> >> >> Do you refer to RDF 2.0 as a new version of the RDF model, or do you >> refer to a new version of RDF/XML? >> > > When I say "RDF 2.0", I refer to and only to a new version of the RDF > model. When I wrote the above paragraph, I had not yet advanced any > proposal for a new serialization of RDF. > O.k. thanks, I understand. And with that made clear I respectfully disagree:-) Any work on RDF 2.0, as you call it, is bound to be non-that-easy and, consequently, longer. I would _not_ want to see the RDF vCard effort to advance in parallel with a new version of RDF. I am not saying such an RDF 2.0 work might not come at some point in the future, but I would definitely prefer to decouple vCard from it... B.t.w., I did not see anything in the discussions on vCard until now that would warrant any change on the RDF model... Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Friday, 27 July 2007 15:06:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:05 UTC