Garret Wilson wrote: > [snip] > Let me stress that I would like the RDF 2.0 effort and the RDF vCard > effort to advance in parallel, so that RDF 2.0 in no way holds up RDF > vCard. I've already provided Harry with a new RDF vCard update, which I > hope to see publicly soon. > > Best, > > Garret > Garret, let me try to be overly pedantic here, but I would like to avoid any misunderstandings. Do you refer to RDF 2.0 as a new version of the RDF model, or do you refer to a new version of RDF/XML? As you have just said yourself, and very very rightfully so, the separation of the RDF model and the particular serialization syntax called RDF/XML is very important. This separation was not properly done in the past, and people equate RDF with RDF/XML. While believe and repeat every time I can that the core RDF model *is* simple, though, unfortunately, its particular serialization called RDF/XML isn't. So what do you refer to? I *hope* what you refer to is RDF/XML 2.0... Not that we may not have to look at some point at the RDF core model again, but that is a very different ballgame... As I said before, the Turtle/N3 serialization does not have any problem with literals on lists. Another serialization in the making is RDFa; although not final yet but the solution we are converging to with lists does not have any problem with that either... Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Friday, 27 July 2007 10:02:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:01 UTC