Re: literals in lists.

• From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
• Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:25:13 -0700
• To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
• CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <46A6DEB9.6070109@globalmentor.com>

Sandro,

Sandro Hawke wrote:
> To be clear, an rdf:List can have literals, it's just that
> parseType=Collection cannot be used with such lists.
>
> I'm curious why you prefer rdf:value for this workaround instead of
> owl:sameAs....      
>   

Can you explain this some more? I'm always on the lookout to improve my 
kludges with better kludges... ;)

Garret

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 05:26:31 UTC