- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:57:44 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, chris@bizer.de, linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:03 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > Subject: Re: Terminology Question concerning Web Architecture and LinkedData > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:55:54 -0400 > > [...] > > > I believe, however, that what we're discussing here is not just any old > > RDF statment. If I had made a statement that "the sky is green", Tim > > might reasonable express the opinion "no, I think Noah has set out a false > > statement." The case we're discussing is different, I think. Tim is, I > > believe, responsible for the association between the URI > > http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i and a resource, or we may > > assume for the sake of argument that W3C has delegated that responsibility > > to him. Tim states that the resource so designated is himself, then he is > > not offering an opinion: he is stating a fact about the resource that he > > has chosen to identify with this URI. The dbpedia folks may similarly > > establish authoritative associations between the URIs they control and > > resources. > > [...] > > > Noah > > But what observable consequences come from this within a computational > system? The one I'm most interested in, currently, is: Tim might be allowed or not allowed to comment on a blog based on social networking data in RDF. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 13:57:59 UTC