- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:50:13 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Cc: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
A definite conclusion would be an update of the draft at [1], which I'm
willing to do.
As for updating vCard RDF, as I said earlier, my first impression is that
I'm happy with Garrett's suggestions that lets us preserve Norm's mapping
but also builds in extra flexibility.
However, what I'd like to see is a nice group of test examples that test
each example, including seeig how difficult a SPARQL query over is.
Shall we schedule a #swig IRC meeting over this?
I'm free next week - say next Wed. at 2:00 PM ET?
-harry
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> Garret Wilson wrote:
>
>> Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm ... so what would it take to declare a "definitive conclusion"?
>>
>> I'd be happy with an update of the draft at http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns
>> . :)
>
> OK, so now how do we get *this* done? Harry, you there? Norm?
>
> Bruce
>
>
--
--harry
Harry Halpin
Informatics, University of Edinburgh
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 18:50:27 UTC