- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:23:59 -0400
- To: Linking Open Data <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Chris Bizer wrote: > Hi all, > > Richard Cyganiak, Tom Heath and me are currently writing a tutorial on how > to publish Linked Data [1] on the Web and ran into some terminology > questions concerning Web Architecture. > > Here is the problem statement together with an example: Within the Linking > Open Data community project [2] different data sources (URI owners) publish > information about Tim Berners-Lee using different HTTP URIs: > > 1. DBpedia: http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee > 2. Hannover DBLP Server: > http://dblp.l3s.de/d2r/resource/authors/Tim_Berners-Lee > 3. Berlin DBLP Server: > http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/dblp/resource/person/100007 > 4. RDF Book Mashup: > http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bookmashup/persons/Tim+Berners-Lee > > The first 3 data sources follow the W3C TAG "Dereferencing HTTP URIs" > finding [3] and redirect via HTTP 303 to documents describing Tim > Berners-Lee when the URIs are dereferenced over the Web. Therefore, the URIs > identify Tim Berners-Lee as a non-information resource. This redirect also > supports HTTP content negotiation and leads to HTML as well as RDF > descriptions of Tim. > > 5. Tim also publishes a FOAF profile in which he assigns the URI > http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i to himself. > > Question 1: According to the terminology of the Architecture of the WWW > document [4] are all these URIs aliases for the same non-information > resource (our current view) or are they referring to different resources? > They are all "Associated" but not "Equivalent" physical Web Resources (information-resources i.e. Web Accessible files) [1] that expose data related to the individual (non-information resource): Tim Berners-Lee. They collectively or individually produce RDF Data Sets containing Literal Objects: "Tim Berners-Lee" in conjunction with explicit URI references to Tim's Personal URI: <http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i> . I think "rdfs:seeAlso" [2] is a more unambiguous mechanism for expressing these associations across Data Sets (Data Sources). I have saved an RDF Browser session [3] that should illustrate my position above. > Does the TAG finding "On Linking Alternative Representations To Enable > Discovery And Publishing " [5] about generic and specific resources apply > here, meaning that the URIs 1,2,3,5 refer to different specific > non-information resources that are related to one generic non-information > resource? > Yes. (imho). > Question 2: When the URIs are dreferenced they provide quite different > information about Tim, which reflects the knowledge and the opinion of the > specific URI owner about him. Within our tutorial we need to talk about this > information and therefore need a term to refer to a concept that can be > described as "information provided by a specific URI owner about a > non-information resource", for example Tim. Depending on the answer to > question 1, what would be the correct Web Architecture term to refer to this > concept? Or is such a term missing? > I think this term is missing. I have used to term: Data Space to attempt to canonicalize what is basically a "Universe of Discourse" as perceived by the owner of the Data Space from these URIs emanate. > Question 3: Depending on the answer to question 1, is it correct to use > owl:sameAs [6] to state that http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i and > http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_Berners-Lee refer to the same thing as it is > done in Tim's profile. > Depends on the characteristics of the property "owl:sameAs" as used in Tim's "Universe of Discourse" (Data Space) and here is why: Yes, if in Tim's Data Space Definition he asserts that "owl:sameAs" is an "owl:SymmetricProperty" then his usage is unambiguous, as this should result in identical triples when you SPARQL against his Data Space using either URI (assuming we are not modeling the Web as a single Graph). Of course, this assumes the SPARQL processor has inference capabilities. Otherwise, "rdfs:seeAlso" would be the preferred property as this is unambiguous (i.e. the aforementioned URIs will produce varied Triples without introducing confusion). Links: 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#sameAs-def 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/#s2.3.4 3. http://demo.openlinksw.com/DAV/home/demo/Public/Queries/DataWeb/Physical_RDF_Web_Resources_Associated_with_TimBL.wqx > Any clarifications on these question would be highly welcomed. > > Cheers > > Chris > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 19:24:10 UTC