Dear Michael, I think the document you refer to should be considered as obsolete. There is now a published OWL1.1 submission at W3C and, I believe, the OWL1.1 community considers that one as the most up-to-date version: http://www.w3.org/Submission/owl11-overview/ and that one makes (at least part of) your question essentially moot:-) Sincerely Ivan Michael Erdmann wrote: > > List, > > can someone please explain the following sentence in the current OWL 1.1 > Semantics draft [1]. The abstract reads: > >> [...] OWL 1.1 does not provide an RDF-compatible semantics; ontologies >> encoded in OWL RDF should be interpreted by converting them into >> functional-style syntax and interpreting the result as specified in >> this document. > > > Does this mean, there will be no RDF/XML serialization for OWL1.1 > models, or will OWL 1.1 merely drop the pseudo-compatibility between OWL > and RDF Schema? > > thanks, > michael > > [1] http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/semantics.html > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 12:28:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:02 UTC