- From: Chris Richard <chris.richard@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:01:37 -0800
- To: "Noah Slater" <nslater@bytesexual.org>
- Cc: "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "Steffen Staab" <staab@uni-koblenz.de>, "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "Fabien Gandon" <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, p.roe@qut.edu.au, j.hogan@qut.edu.au, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
But you are in control of the RDF/XML serialisation and do it in a consistent way, right? You can't grab any old RDF/XML and run this XSLT on it even if it the data uses the same RDF schema. On Dec 18, 2007 7:48 AM, Noah Slater <nslater@bytesexual.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:12:06PM +0000, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > Tool support for RDF/XML is better than for N3 or other formats. There is > > more data available in RDF/XML. It is an official W3C standard. Those are > > the good things. > > In an application I am developing, at least, RDF/XML is a usful > serialisation format solely because of it's ability to be transformed > via XSLT in the browser. > > -- > Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> > > "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as > society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman >
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 16:01:46 UTC