- From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:48:34 -0400
- To: Amit Kapoor <amitkapoor@mindspring.com>
- CC: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>, semantic-web@w3c.org
Amit Kapoor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:08:04PM +0200, Benjamin Nowack wrote: >>> I need annotation support for an ontogy [1]. The annotea schema looks >>> pretty good, but what is the status of it these days? Is anybody using >>> it? >> I'm using it for several Web2.0-ish things where a plain rdfs:comment >> doesn't suffice, e.g. all comments and trackbacks on my blog are >> annotea-based. I'm currently playing with user-specific annotations >> such as bookmarks, where it seems to fit nicely, too. I really like it. >> It's stable and simple. > > We are also using it as a basis for annotations in our platform. You can > see the deployed example at http://www.plosone.org/. We are not supporting > the protocol yet, just the information model. Nice site! > Honestly it would great if Annotea could be updated. We are not sure what > the right forum is. Not a lot of traffic on the www-annotation mailing > list. What kind of changes would you like to see? The use case we're thinking of here is pretty much the same as your's (though perhaps a little broader). Bruce
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 02:49:07 UTC