Re: ontology for units of measurement and/or physical quantities

Le 29 sept. 06 à 07:38, Danny Ayers a écrit :
> In the defence of, er, the devil, I'd have to note that the source of
> the example, the RDF Primer[1], doesn't cover the layer which includes
> functional properties (is the approach a reasonable
> model/approximation? Ok,  your point above says not). Can't help but
> notice too that the doc "has been endorsed by the Director as a W3C
> Recommendation"...

In the defence of the angel…

	W3C:Director != private:TBL

And that's true for most of us, our role in a company and our  
personal opinions in a technology are not necessary 100% matching. :)  
That would be funny to express in n3. The fact to have the same  
foaf:name doesn't make the context equivalent.


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 09:19:47 UTC