Le 29 sept. 06 à 07:38, Danny Ayers a écrit : > In the defence of, er, the devil, I'd have to note that the source of > the example, the RDF Primer[1], doesn't cover the layer which includes > functional properties (is the approach a reasonable > model/approximation? Ok, your point above says not). Can't help but > notice too that the doc "has been endorsed by the Director as a W3C > Recommendation"... In the defence of the angel… W3C:Director != private:TBL And that's true for most of us, our role in a company and our personal opinions in a technology are not necessary 100% matching. :) That would be funny to express in n3. The fact to have the same foaf:name doesn't make the context equivalent. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 09:19:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:58 UTC