- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:58:05 -0400
- To: Max Völkel <voelkel@fzi.de>, semantic-web@w3.org
Max, At IBM we have been doing some work in the area and we are exploring possible answers to your questions in Queso [1] We give access for read/write via an Atom Publishing Protocol endpoint. The contents are converted using AtomOWL to RDF (i.e. the entire contents of the Atom entry XML) and if the content is XHTML, we extract RDF triples encoded in RDFa and make them available as triples. Yes, XML-elements become XMLLiterals, subjects are URIs??? (not sure what else it could be) and yes it's working great for SPARQL queries. -Elias [1] http://torrez.us/archives/2006/07/17/471/ Max Völkel wrote: > Hi RDFa'ers, > > I still have a tiny but (to me) important question about RDFa. > > First, it seems a great idea that I can annotate my XHTML document > with RDF, even better, I can annotate each individual element with > RDF, can make elements being the subject or object of RDF > statements. Wow. I even can make RDF statements unrelated to > elements on the page. Wow. > > Okay, how do I represent such structures in an API/triple store? > > Will the XML-elements become XML-Literals? What for the subjects? > Are XPointer-expressions usingthe document as their root an > identifier for subjects? I worry, because I need to represent the > XML+RDFa somehow in a triple store in order to to e.g. SPARQL > queries. > > Maybe I overlooked something, but I never found this relation > explained. > > Kind regards, > > Max Völkel > -- > Dipl.-Inform. Max Völkel, Universität Karlsruhe / FZI > nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org > voelkel@fzi.de +49 721 9654-854 www.xam.de > > >
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 16:01:45 UTC