- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:07:02 +0100
- To: Bernard vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Marc <marc@geonames.org>
Bernard vatant wrote: > > > Hi Richard >> You have to either do "the hash thing" or "the 303 thing" (see [1]), >> combining both like this won't work because you'd have to set up a >> document http://ws.geonames.org/rdf which contains the descriptions of >> *all* your concepts. > Thank you. I thought I had understood it all at last, but now I'm > completely lost again. :-D > You mean if we do the hash thing, we don't need redirection? So what is > supposed to happen then with > "http://ws.geonames.org/rdf#geonameId=3014258 " in a http GET ? The web server would only see http://ws.geonames.org/rdf so you'd need something *before* the # if you want the server to be able to discriminate and send different RDF for different parts of the dataset. > I'm lost for the moment, sorry. I guess I have to go and re-read all > this prose I've tried desperately to make sense of ... Are the recipies in http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/ helpful here? >> I think this is all you'd have to do to get the TAG stamp of approval. > <rant> > Please folks, if you want to have people jump happily in the SW train, > stop saying in specifications and recommendations : you can do this way, > or that way, or otherwise, "it does not matter". Put ID numbers on the left side of #, and append #it, to avoid messing around with HTTP redirects. cheers, Dan
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 15:02:27 UTC