- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:12:42 +0200
- To: Hans Teijgeler <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- CC: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Paap, Onno" <onno.paap@gmail.com>
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2006 07:12:53 UTC
The way I see, personally, is that RDF/OWL are abstract models and there are various serialization of those. There is RDF/XML and Turtle, and both are o.k. Similarly, for, eg, a SPARQL return, there is XML and JSON and it will depend on what you do which one you will prefer; the important is the 'abstract' SPARQL query and what it returns. Ie: I do not see JSON and RDF/OWL at the same level of abstraction at all... Cheers Ivan Hans Teijgeler wrote: > Folks, > > Can someone explain to me why I would need JSON if I work with RDF and OWL? > > JSON may be slick, but it contributes to further fragmentation of the IT > world, I think. Or am I totally wrong? > > Please enlighten me. > > Regards, > Hans > ____________________ > OntoConsult > Hans Teijgeler > ISO 15926 specialist > Netherlands > +31-72-509 2005 > www.InfowebML.ws <http://www.infowebml.ws/> > hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl <mailto:hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl> > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.0.407 / Virus Database: 268.13.0/464 - Release Date: 05-Oct-06 > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Saturday, 7 October 2006 07:12:53 UTC