- From: Stijn Heymans <stijn.heymans@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:38:54 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 07:25:52 UTC
Hi, On Tuesday 03 October 2006 21:03, Matt Williams wrote: > Dear All, > > I have noticed that many of the attempts at OWL reasoning using > rules run into problems on dealing with OWL-DL. > > As I understand it, this is because OWL reasoning gets complex when > we include things like nominals and some cardinality. > > Does anyone have any references/pointers that explain this in more > depth? Ian Horrocks and Peter F. Patel-Schneider. A proposal for an OWL rules language. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/Publications/download/2004/HoPa04a.pdf might be a good starting point (see section 6 on undecidability issues). best, Stijn -- http://members.deri.at/~stijnh/contact.html ++ ALF: Name's ALF. I carry a bat.
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 07:25:52 UTC