W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Use or alias in vCard/RDF?

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:27:46 +0100
Message-ID: <456B3C32.4060403@mondeca.com>
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Cc: Semantic web list <semantic-web@w3.org>

Hi Kjetil
> I think we should think of vCard as being a card, but that it belongs to 
> a foaf:Agent. That is, I hope we could have a foaf:has_vcard property 
> with domain foaf:Agent and range vcard:VCard. Would it then be a 
> reasonable extension to vCard to have the converse, vcard:belongs_to?
If you really mean it, could you expand on the rationale to have the 
property "has_vcard" defined in the foaf: namespace, and the inverse 
property "belongs_to" in the vcard: one?
Seems to me that defining two inverse properties in namespaces managed 
independently is quite risky. Why not defining the two properties in the 
vcard space, and let FOAF folks incorporate it if they feel like it?



*Bernard Vatant
*Knowledge Engineering
*3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
Tel:       +33 (0) 871 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Blog:    Leçons de Choses <http://mondeca.wordpress.com/>
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 19:28:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:59 UTC