- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:51:23 -0600
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Harry, Brian, Norm, DanBri, So we have another pair of URIs for latitude/longitude: http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#latitude http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#longitude Is it worth maintaining those URIs in addition to these? http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#lat http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#long I suggest not. I suggest obsoleting 2006/vcard/ns#latitude in favor of 2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#lat . As a test case, we could use http://microformats.org/tests/hcard/25-geo-abbr.html Hmm... trying that with hcard2rdf.xsl (1.3 2006/11/14) I see that it doesn't grok the relevant abbreviation. Is that by design? So many details... As a second choice, I suggest putting 3 triples per property in both schemas: (1) for the OWL-knowledgeable: geo:lat owl:samePropertyAs vcard:latitude. and (2) for agents that know only RDFS: geo:lat rdfs:subPropertyOf vcard:latitude. vcard:latitude rdfs:subPropertyOf geo:lat. Perhaps likewise for vcard:Location and geo:Point; I'm not sure. I wonder what social process these terms are ultimately grounded in... I think both vcard and the 2003/01/geo spec normatively cite WGS84... hmm... no, RFC2426 doesn't defer to any other spec for lat/long http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2426#sec3.4.2 It's RFC2445 were I saw the normative reference... [[ With the exception of the special condition described above, this form is specified in Department of Commerce, 1986, Representation of geographic point locations for information interchange (Federal Information Processing Standard 70-1): Washington, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. ]] http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445#sec4.8.1.6 and I think I did some spelunking and found that this FIPS spec is a thin layer over WGS84. Oddly, 2003/01/geo doesn't seem to cite any definition either. Wikipedia cites a NIMA tech report... eek... it's only good thru 2010?!? I wonder if the process for the next version is rolling yet. [[ The World Geodetic System defines a fixed global reference frame for the Earth, for use in geodesy and navigation. The latest revision is WGS 84 dating from 1984 (last revised in 2004), which will be valid up to about 2010. ... NIMA Technical Report TR8350.2 Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984, Its Definition and Relationships With Local Geodetic Systems, Third Edition, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. This is the official publication of the standard, including addenda. ]] -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Geodetic_System -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:51:38 UTC