- From: Max Völkel <voelkel@fzi.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:01:44 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, timbl@w3.org
>> I'm not sure I understand the point of moreData. It's supposed to be >> weaker than the (weak already) seeAlso, to the point where it's a >> relation which doesn't relate subject to object? ("Further information >> that may or may not be related to the subject resource") > Yep, I think that summarises my discomfort too. RDFCore had the choice > to make seeAlso more specific, but we went with the loose version. There > is no restriction on syntax, dataset size, availability (ACLs etc). Or > even that the referenced data encodes RDF statements about the same > thing (let alone that it use the same URI for it). Well, we also have rdf:isDefinedBy. Informally, this seems to imply that there will be some RDF where the given resource is at least mentioned. We should inspire the RDF linked data discussion by existing web things like HTML links. Why are there so rarely really large pages? If there are large big pages, how are they handled? etc... Kind regards, Max Völkel -- Dipl.-Inform. Max Völkel, Universität Karlsruhe / FZI nepomuk.semanticdesktop.org voelkel@fzi.de +49 721 9654-854 www.xam.de
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2006 09:51:57 UTC