- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:56:04 -0500
- To: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
-Alan, > Personally, I can't tell why content negotiation is a good > idea in any context. To my mind it's hiding interesting > information in the innards of a network protocol instead > having it explicitly available, in say, OWL or RDF. > > If you think I'm way wrong, please do flame me. I'd like to > be able to see that it *is* a good idea, if that's possible. I won't make comment on if it is a good idea or not, but content negotiation is a necessary mechanism. Accept is in the same spirit of Accept Language, right? Do you think Accept Language is a good or a bad idea? Xiaoshu
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 23:58:41 UTC