RE: "Hash URIs" and content negotiation


> Personally, I can't tell why content negotiation is a good 
> idea in any context. To my mind it's hiding interesting 
> information in the innards of a network protocol instead 
> having it explicitly available, in say, OWL or RDF.
> If you think I'm way wrong, please do flame me. I'd like to 
> be able to see that it *is* a good idea, if that's possible.

I won't make comment on if it is a good idea or not, but content negotiation
is a necessary mechanism. Accept is in the same spirit of Accept Language,
right? Do you think Accept Language is a good or a bad idea?


Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 23:58:41 UTC