- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 08:33:18 -0600
- To: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <g.tummarello@gmail.com>, Chris Bizer <bizer@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, semantic-web@w3.org, bastian@quilitz.de, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Tobias Gauß <tobias.gauss@web.de>
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 18:33 +0200, Chris Bizer wrote: [...] > > The cool factor is probably in the URI rewriting. > > But then again, maybe that is not a good idea? I wonder if putting > > instead in your foaf file a triple that says yourpage#cris sameAs > > bigtimedb/id12345 would be more useful.. e.g. if the tabulator found > > other graphs where you are mentioned as the OTHER URI then such triple > > would do the mapping , the query wouldn't. > > You are right, but this should be done in addition to setting the link not > as an alternative. > If we want the Semantic Web to succeed, we need easily navigate-able links > NOW, instead of waiting for some hyper-intelligent discovery and mapping > algorithms that might be invented sometime in the future. "hyper-intelligent"? handling owl:sameAs in this case is simpler than SPARQL, no? I think the tabulator already does it. I'm not sure. In fact, the SPARQL queries are a sort of substitution-of-equals-for-equals corrolary to the owl:sameAs statement. I suppose it's fine to play around with both alternatives for a while, though the SPARQL CONSTRUCT approach feels like overkill, to me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 14:33:32 UTC